The new database sub tables on existing databases schemas

Is it necessary to prefix sub tables with main table names only if you use custom databases, or it is also necessary if you use Database Manager?

I don’t think I ever use this naming convention. Eg if I had these tables:
customers > orders > order items
… if I understand correctly, I would have to have to name the last table something like orders_orderitems. If I wanted to create a query with orders nested within customers, does that mean I would have to name the orders table, customers_orders (and therefore rename the last table customers_orders_orderitems)?

I’ve probably misunderstood how the new feature works. and perhaps it’s not in fact necessary to adopt this naming convention.

(I don’t think I ever think about ‘sub tables’ - perhaps ‘child tables’ but it’s a matter of context.)

Community Page
Last updated: